INTERDISCIPLINARITY AND THE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT: RESEARCH FROM A LUDIC ACTIVITY OF STUDENT INTEREST

Authors

  • Cleci Teresinha Werner da Rosa UPF
  • Álvaro Becker da Rosa Universidade de Passo Fundo
  • Alisson Cristian Giacomelli Universidade de Passo Fundo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X18771

Keywords:

Interdisciplinaridade. Lançamento de Foguetes. Ensino Médio

Abstract

The present study discusses the involvement of students and teachers in an interdisciplinary ludic activity. The main objective of the research presented is to investigate acceptance and participation of the school community in interdisciplinary activities involving acts of engagement and ludicity. The activity selected for the investigation was a competition of rockets made of plastic bottles, and pressurized by water and air. Math, Physics, Chemistry, and History were contents analyzed within interdisciplinarity. The subjects of the research were high school teachers from four public schools that are part of the Institutional Scholarship Program for Teacher Initiation (Pibid) - Physics subproject. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews that were audio recorded, which indicated as a result the feasibility of this type of activity, especially regarding the involvement of the school community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cleci Teresinha Werner da Rosa, UPF

Doutroado em Educação Científica e Tecnológica

Coordenadora do Programa de Pós-graduação em Ensino de Ciências e Matemática

Professora do Curso de Física

Coordenadora de Área do Pibid/Capes/UPF

Álvaro Becker da Rosa, Universidade de Passo Fundo

Mestre em Ciências - Eng. Biomédica

Coordenador da Àrea de Física

Docente do Curso de Física e engenharias

Alisson Cristian Giacomelli, Universidade de Passo Fundo

Graduado em FísicaEspecialista em Ensino de FísicaMestrando em Ensino de Ciências e MatemáticaDocente do Curso de Física e engenharias UPF

References

André, M.E.D.A. Etnografia na prática escolar. Campinas: Papirus; 1995.

Bardin, L. A análise de conteúdo. Tradução de Luís Antero Reto e Augusto Pinheiro. 3. st. Lisboa: Edições 70; 2004.

Driver, R.; Newton, P.; Osborne, J. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education. 2000;84:287-312.

Hartmann, A.M.; Zimmermann, E. O trabalho interdisciplinar no Ensino Médio: a reaproximação das “duas culturas”. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências. 2007;7(2):1-16.

Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P.; Díaz de Bustamante, J. Discurso de aula y argumentación em la clase de ciencias: cuestiones teóricas y metodológicas. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 2003;21(3): 359-371.

Maluf, A.C.M. Atividades lúdicas como estratégias de ensino aprendizagem. [Internet]. 2006. [cited 2014 out 17]; Available from:<http://www.psicopedagogia.com.br/artigos/artigo.asp?entrID=850>.

Megid Neto, J.; Pacheco, D. Pesquisas sobre o ensino de Física do 2° grau no Brasil. In: Nardi, R., editor. Pesquisas em ensino de física. São Paulo: Escrituras; 1998. p. 5-20.

Ministério da Educação. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: Ciências. Brasília (Brasil): MEC/Secretaria de Educação Fundamental; 1998.

Ministério da Educação Secretaria de Educação Média e Tecnológica. PCN + Ensino Médio: orientações educacionais complementares aos Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais. Ciências da Natureza, Matemática e suas Tecnologias. Brasília (Brasil): MEC/Secretaria de Educação Básica; 2002.

Mozena, E.R.; Ostermann, F. Uma revisão bibliográfica sobre a interdisciplinaridade no ensino das ciências da natureza. Revista Ensaio. 2014;16(2):185-206.

Nunes, A.R.S.C. O lúdico na aquisição da segunda língua. [Internet]. 2004. [cited 2015 jul 11]; Available from: < <http://www.linguaestrangeira.pro.br/artigos_papers/ludico_linguas.htm>.

Roitman, I. A educação científica no Brasil. [Internet]. 2014. [cited 2015 jul 11]; Available from:<http://www.pensaraeducacaoempauta.com/#!isaac-roitman-27mar/c13hb>. Acesso em: 14 abr. 2015.

Rosa, C.T.W. da. Interdisciplinaridade: concepção e aplicações no ensino de ciências. In: Rosa, C.T.W., editor. Educação científica e tecnológica: reflexões e investigações. Passo Fundo: UPF Editora, 2015, p. 39-55.

Santomé, J. T. Globalização e interdisciplinaridade: o currículo integrado. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1998.

Sardá J.A.; Sanmartí Puig, N. Ensenyar a argumentar científicament: un repte enles classes de ciències. Enseñanza de las Ciencias. 2000;18(3):405-423.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-31

How to Cite

Rosa, C. T. W. da, Rosa, Álvaro B. da, & Giacomelli, A. C. (2016). INTERDISCIPLINARITY AND THE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT: RESEARCH FROM A LUDIC ACTIVITY OF STUDENT INTEREST. Ciência E Natura, 38(1), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X18771

Issue

Vol. 38 No. 1 (2016)

Section

Teaching

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.