EVALUATION OF THE QUALITY OF WATER IN THE REGION OF SANTA MARIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X19756Keywords:
água, análise, potabilidade, qualidadeAbstract
This study aims to assess the water quality of the central region of Rio Grande do Sul State, through chemical analyzes (conductivity, color, nitrogen, dissolved oxygen, hardness, pH, temperature, total dissolved solids, iron content and turbidity) . The samples were divided into thirty-seven points, corresponding to twenty- two collections in neighborhoods and fifteen districts in the Santa Maria area during 2014 2nd semester. After performing experimental procedures we compared the results with the values accepted by law. It was found that most samples are in accordance with the water quality parameters of class 2.Downloads
References
Bordin, T. F. ; Maciel, A. V. ; Izário Filho, H. J. ; Vasconcellos, N. J. S.; Salazar, R.F.S. (2015) Controle de qualidade das águas do arroio Taquara I (Santa Maria - RS) para abastecimento. Higiene Alimentar, 29, 5160-5164.
Branco, S. M. Hidrologia aplicada à engenharia sanitária. São Paulo: CETESB/ASCETESB, 1986.
Brasil. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Conama – Conselho Nacional Do Meio Ambiente. Resolução 357, de 17 de março de 2005. Brasília, Ministério do Meio Ambiente, p. 1-23, 2005. Disponível em: <http://www.mma.gov.br/conama/res/res05/res35705>. Acesso em: 6 agosto de 2015.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria MS Nº 2914 de 12/12/2011 (Federal) – Dispõe sobre os procedimentos de controle e de vigilância da qualidade da água para consumo humano e seu padrão de potabilidade. Disponível em: <http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2011/prt2914_12_12_2011.html>. Acesso em: 6 agosto de 2015.
Grassi, M. T. (2001). As águas do planeta Terra. Cadernos Temáticos de Química Nova na Escola. São Paulo, edição especial, maio.
Macêdo, J. A. B. (2003). Métodos Laboratoriais de Análises físico-químicas e microbiológicas. 2° edição Belo Horizonte/MG: CRQ-MG,
Philippi Jr., A.; Roméro, M. De A.; Bruna, G. C. (2004). Curso de Gestão Ambiental. São Paulo: Manole.
Righes, A. A.; Buriol, G. A.; Boer, N. (2009). Água e Educação - Princípios e estratégias de uso e conservação. Santa Maria: Palotti.
Rocha, A. A. (1995). Ciências do ambiente, saneamento, saúde pública. São Paulo: Departamento de Saúde Ambiental. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Universidade de São Paulo.
Rocha, T. C.; Rosa, A. H.; Cardoso, A. A. (2004). Introdução à química ambiental. Porto Alegre: Bookmam.
Souza, L. C. de (2008). Águas e sua proteção. 1° edição (ano 2004), 4° tir. Curitiba: JURUÁ,
Vendrame, A. C. (2006). Perícia Ambiental - Uma abordagem Multidisciplinar. São Paulo: IOB Thonson.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
